Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label global warming. Show all posts

Friday, February 14, 2014

Want To Learn Global Warming? Start From The Ocean

Global warming refers to the continous rising in the average temperature of the Earth’s climate system. It is the current change in Earth’s climate. It also refers to the increase in the average temperature of air and sea at the Earth’s surface. Since 1971, 90% of the warming has occured in the ocean. That is why ocean is the right place to start understanding global warming phenomenon which occured in our blue planet. Global warming affects the global conveyor belt and other physical properties of ocean water.
The Global Conveyor Belt
Source: http://science.howstuffworks.com/
What is the global conveyor belt? It is the deep ocean current which is driven by density differences in the sea water. It is also called thermohaline circulation because water density affects by its temperature (thermo) and salinity (haline). Density is an object’s mass per unit volume. Colder and saltier water equals denser water.  When water freezes, salt does not necessarily freeze with it. So, at the earth’s pole, large volume of dense cold and salt water is left behind. This large volume of water sinks to the bottom and other large volume of water replace it, creating a current. This other large volume of water will get cold and sinks continuing the cycle. That is why the global conveyor belt starts near the North Pole and goes to south between America and Africa toward Antartica, partly directed by the land they face. In Antartica, it enchanced by more cold water and divided into two direction; one of it goes to the Indian Ocean and the other goes to the Pacific Ocean. Because both of them is close to equator, it warms up and goes to the surface; this phenomenon is called upwelling. When they encounter land and cannot go any farther, it turns back to the South Atlantic Ocean and finally gets back to the North Atlantic Ocean. Then the cycle starts again. It takes 1,000 years to complete one full cycle around the globe.

Climate change like global warming affects the ocean. First, it makes the ocean warmer because the ocean absorb 80% of the heat added to the Earth’s system. Second, rising in greenhouse gases as one of the cause of global warming, causing increased atmospheric temperature which cause the iceberg at the poles and glaciers to melt  Third, the first and second effect I have mention cause sea water level to rise. Fourth, changes in ocean temperature and wind patterns as the result of overall climate change, will affect and change the ocean’s major current system which is the global conveyor belt I have explained in the second paragraph. Increased precipitation and the widespread of ice melting caused by global warming could create a larger layer of fresh water that would slow or prevent normal thermohaline mixing that occurs and would affect the current offshore from Greenland and Newfoundland.  The normal thermohaline circulation has suddenly stopped and recovered in the past, causing the climate to keep changing from warm to cold to become warm again. Fifth, the burning of fossil fuels that increases greenhouse gas level in the atmosphere, is also changing the chemical composition of sea water, making it more acidic.
           
In conclusion, if you want to learn global warming phenomenon, it is better to learn it from the ocean, from the physical phenomenon that happens in the ocean. Global warming affects a lot of aspect in the ocean. It affects the temperature of the ocean and the polar ice to melt. These events lead to the rising of sea water level. Change in ocean temperature, wind patterns, increased precipitation, and the melting of ice would affect and change the global conveyor belt. Besides that, the burning of fossil fuels that causes global warming, also makes sea water more acidic.

Data Sources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/oceanography/ocean-current3.htm
http://www.conservation.org/Documents/Climate%20Change%20on%20the%20Ocean.pdf
http://www.neaq.org/conservation_and_research/climate_change/climate_change_and_the_oceans.php

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Are We Ready For Electric Cars?

According to the article that I have read, the government aiming to mass produce 10,000 electric cars in 2014. As part of the government policy to limit fuel subsidies, they have once planned to promote the use of gas for the transportation. However, electric cars are more likely to answer the problem of the increasing of fuel subsidies that is caused by the increasing fossil fuel consumption. Moreover, along with public awareness of global warming and the urgent need to reduce carbon emissions, the use of electric cars in our transportation system looks unavoidable.
File:Roadster 2.5 charging.jpg
Tesla Roadster recharging
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/
The writer of the article which I read also wrote that one of the social benefits of electric cars as compared to fossil-fueled cars, is to reduce air pollution. This can further result in improving public health quality. However, the level of pollution will not decrease when there is not enough power resource to be utilized by electric cars and other electric devices needed by households and industries. Electricity, which is used to reduce air pollution in industrial activities, will instead be used to power electric cars. In addition, if electric cars get electricity from power plants that rely on fossil fuels, then the argument that electric cars are environmentally friendly cannot be accepted. If that occurs, it only replaces fossil fuel consumption from power plants to electric cars. Moreover, if the government really wants to develop electrical energy for our transportation system, they should start from generating electrical energy that should already be environmentally friendly and sustainable, which results in the form of convenient and reliable electric mass transportation.

In my opinion, the electricity infrastructure is not yet ready to support electric cars for personal use. Based on the illustration from other article that I read, the installed capacity of the domestic power resource reaches around 5,000 kWh annualy, while the power resource needed by households is around 4,500 kWh annualy. If there are 1,000 units of electric cars operated by an average power of 5-10 kWh, the installed capacity should reach about 9,500 annualy. This means that the government should build new power plants to meet the increased power requirements up to twice of the installed capacity. How about the increased power requirements for 10,000 units of electric cars which is the aim of the government in 2014?

Besides, the power plants in Indonesia are generally operated by environmentally unfriendly energy such as coals and petroleum. This makes electric cars become environmentally unfriendly, just like the conventional cars. This is because the new power plants that are built to meet the power requirements to operate electric cars will increase the level of air pollution. In conclusion, I agree with the writer; if the government wants to use electric cars in our transportation system, they should start from generating environmentally friendly electrical energy.